Meryl Streep, in her Golden Globes speech, made not a single mention of Donald Trump's name, used no personal attack, but only called attention to a type of activity that she disapproved of. Donald immediately took offense, treating it as personal attack since by describing the activity without ascribing it to anyone, he knew that he owned it.
Of course, the video evidence notwithstanding, Donald denied ever having bullied anyone or mocked the disability of a reporter.
Tuesday, January 10, 2017
Monday, January 9, 2017
GUEST POST
New post on The Octogenarians |
|
ALL THE TRICKS OF THE TRADE
One of the ploys, used by Donald Trump, to convince his supporters, to vote for him, was that, because he was, himself, guilty of gaming the system, he would be the ideal person to be able to use his skills to benefit his supporters.
One of his skills has been to use other people's money to build things to his benefit and then to manipulate circumstances so as to avoid paying for them either partially or in full. That is why it seemed perfectly feasible, to some, that he could build a multi-billion dollar wall, which could accrue to the benefit of America, without having to pay for it. Now it appears that the American taxpayer is to advance the funds and Trump will somehow have a 3d party reimburse us by an undisclosed method, just "trust him".
In the past, it has been the people who have advanced the funds, or in some cases,the goods and services, that have been left holding the bag. Trump has a lot of experience in that sort of a scenario; not so much in paying funds back.
One of his skills has been to use other people's money to build things to his benefit and then to manipulate circumstances so as to avoid paying for them either partially or in full. That is why it seemed perfectly feasible, to some, that he could build a multi-billion dollar wall, which could accrue to the benefit of America, without having to pay for it. Now it appears that the American taxpayer is to advance the funds and Trump will somehow have a 3d party reimburse us by an undisclosed method, just "trust him".
In the past, it has been the people who have advanced the funds, or in some cases,the goods and services, that have been left holding the bag. Trump has a lot of experience in that sort of a scenario; not so much in paying funds back.
Sunday, January 8, 2017
WHAT'S IN A NAME?
Early in the first term of the Obama Presidency, Republicans began to, derisively, refer to the Affordable Care Act, as "Obamacare". I stated, at the time, in a letter to the editor of the Miami Herald, that they, the Republicans, would come to rue the day they coined the expression.
When one thinks about it, the ACA is the only sensible compromise as opposed to a single payer system, and was devised by the Republicans, as such, and to repeal it is opposed by organizations, nominally part of the Republican constituency, such as the AMA and the Health Insurance industry, it may be that the greatest, single problem Republicans have is how to get people to stop calling it "Obamacare". They may be wanting to repeal it so they can bring it back under a different name, without the Public just keeping the old label.
When one thinks about it, the ACA is the only sensible compromise as opposed to a single payer system, and was devised by the Republicans, as such, and to repeal it is opposed by organizations, nominally part of the Republican constituency, such as the AMA and the Health Insurance industry, it may be that the greatest, single problem Republicans have is how to get people to stop calling it "Obamacare". They may be wanting to repeal it so they can bring it back under a different name, without the Public just keeping the old label.
PRECIDENTIAL AMNESIA
The election of the next Democratic President will immediately bring on an epidemic which will obliterate the memory, of all Trump supporters, of the precedents that the Donald has set.
Cries of righteous indignation will fill the land as Democrats request the immediate resignation of all of Trump's diplomatic appointees; hearings on the nomination of all Cabinet appointees before completion of the vetting process; waiver of requirements for presentation of tax returns, etc.
Only the election of another "Conservative" President will cure them of their situational amnesia.
Cries of righteous indignation will fill the land as Democrats request the immediate resignation of all of Trump's diplomatic appointees; hearings on the nomination of all Cabinet appointees before completion of the vetting process; waiver of requirements for presentation of tax returns, etc.
Only the election of another "Conservative" President will cure them of their situational amnesia.
Saturday, January 7, 2017
PUTIN'S PROTEGE
Donald Trump, who has already been the beneficiary of Putin's renowned skills in intervening in the elections of other countries, is due to receive even more largesse from Maestro Putin. Immediately after his inauguration, Trump will be tutored in another of Putin's skills, namely, how to become President-for-Life.
Wednesday, January 4, 2017
A WIN-WIN SITUATION FOR THE DEMOCRATS?
If one considers the slim margin by which Trump won the key states, which gave him the Electoral College victory, and the fact that a large number of those votes came from people who were of relatively poor circumstances, and who are benefitting, many for the first time in their lives by having medical insurance, through Obamacare, it is possible that the repeal of the ACA, by Republicans, will be advantageous to the Democrats, if these voters will have learned their lesson. If not, perhaps the loss of medical attention will have lowered the number of this voting bloc, still capable of voting at all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)