tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1726678915146375316.post371801453813297277..comments2023-05-17T03:33:17.223-07:00Comments on Pitcher in the Wry: FAULTY TRADE AGREEMENTSJeaniehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15196678364556928854noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1726678915146375316.post-53222037775205964422016-07-03T06:53:08.819-07:002016-07-03T06:53:08.819-07:00I stick by my contention that the perceived faults...I stick by my contention that the perceived faults of the trade agreements come from our own people abusing the pacts rather than the other signatories to the pact.Herbhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01547233819520063276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1726678915146375316.post-28101374580406906552016-06-30T09:01:22.551-07:002016-06-30T09:01:22.551-07:00I agree with your assertions up to a point. Obviou...I agree with your assertions up to a point. Obviously, how any agreement is implemented has great bearing on how that agreement is viewed.<br /> <br />That said, several of our trade agreements were written with embedded faults. Those faults left the agreements open to abusive interpretations. When any party to an agreement chooses to use the faults to their advantage, the agreement is sullied.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05500056011741667287noreply@blogger.com